Friday, November 25, 2011

How to tune oracle Database?

Collecting and analyzing the AWR reports for Oracle Database:


Hi,
Tuning the Database is very much essential not only for better execution of SQL statement but also for applications running well using that Database.AWR(Automatic workload repository) report gives us clear picture in Deciding and tuning Database as well as SQL statement.As Enterprise Manager we can see it easily but Enterprise manager needs license(additional cost) so some companies does not want to use Oracle Enterprise Manager.Oracle gives us flexible option in which we can generated awr report in html and plain format.
It is better to generate in html format for seeing it clearly by using any web browser.Since performance tuning is a deep ocean I will be updating this thread based on my problems faced and the method which work fine for tuning purpose.


Collecting awr report from SQL prompt:

Login to the Database as 'sys' user(SYSDBA) and make sure Database is up & running and Oracle Environment for the particular Database
is set.we can gather the awr report using 'awrrpt.sql'.

Note:If we want the awr report in Oracle RAC environment than we have to use 'awrgrpt.sql' script,as there you have to gather the report for multiple instances running on various nodes.

SQL> select name from v$database;

NAME
---------
TESTDB

SQL> select status from v$instance;

STATUS
------------
OPEN

SQL> @?/rdbms/admin/awrrpt.sql

Current Instance
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DB Id DB Name Inst Num Instance
----------- ------------ -------- ------------
3628069655 TESTDB 1 TESTDB


Specify the Report Type
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Would you like an HTML report, or a plain text report?
Enter 'html' for an HTML report, or 'text' for plain text
Defaults to 'html'
Enter value for report_type: html

Type Specified: html


Instances in this Workload Repository schema
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


DB Id Inst Num DB Name Instance Host
------------ -------- ------------ ------------ ------------
* 3628069655 1 TESTDB TESTDB TESTNODE1.comp.com



Using 3628069655 for database Id
Using 1 for instance number


Specify the number of days of snapshots to choose from
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Entering the number of days (n) will result in the most recent
(n) days of snapshots being listed. Pressing without
specifying a number lists all completed snapshots.


Enter value for num_days: 1

Listing the last day's Completed Snapshots

Snap
Instance DB Name Snap Id Snap Started Level
------------ ------------ --------- ------------------ -----
TESTDB TESTDB 5590 24 Nov 2011 00:30 1
5591 24 Nov 2011 01:30 1
5592 24 Nov 2011 02:30 1
5593 24 Nov 2011 03:30 1
5594 24 Nov 2011 04:30 1
5595 24 Nov 2011 05:30 1
5596 24 Nov 2011 06:30 1
5597 24 Nov 2011 07:30 1
5598 24 Nov 2011 08:30 1
5599 24 Nov 2011 09:30 1
5600 24 Nov 2011 10:30 1
5601 24 Nov 2011 11:30 1
5602 24 Nov 2011 12:30 1
5603 24 Nov 2011 13:30 1
5604 24 Nov 2011 14:30 1
5605 24 Nov 2011 15:30 1


Specify the Begin and End Snapshot Ids
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Enter value for begin_snap: 5604
Begin Snapshot Id specified: 5604

Enter value for end_snap: 5605
End Snapshot Id specified: 5605


Specify the Report Name
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The default report file name is awrrpt_1_5604_5605.html. To use this name,
press to continue, otherwise enter an alternative.

Enter value for report_name: awrrpt_NOV24_2011_2_30_3_30_PM.html


SQL> exit
We will see the html format of the awr report in the current operating system path.

[oracle@TESTNODE1 ~]$ ls -altr awr*
-rw-r--r-- 1 oracle dba 458371 Nov 24 14:02 awrrpt_1_5590_5603.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 oracle dba 390564 Nov 24 16:31 awrrpt_NOV24_2011_2_30_3_30_PM.html

We can copy this html file using copying tool(winscp or ftp) to our machine and review using web browsers(mozilla or IE supported
versions).


Analzing the awr report and suggesting possible recommendations:
Once we obtain the awr report our main motive is to analyze the awr report and come up with possible recommendations.Depending
on the size of our Production Database we can come up with possible recommendations.This recommendation should be first implemented in
test environment and after successful results should be adopted in production environments.

1) Redo logs:

We need to make sure our redo logs are large enough.Check the number of log switches, one every twenty minutes is ideal, more than this is too high and you should make them larger to reduce the number of switches.

We can find the log switches in the Instance Activity Stats part of the awr report.

Example:

Instance Activity Stats - Thread Activity

* Statistics identified by '(derived)' come from sources other than SYSSTAT

Statistic Total per Hour
log switches (derived) 2 2.00

We can see in this system there are 2 log swtiches per hourly basis,which is good.So this tells us the redo logs are large enough.

2)Parsing:

Check the hard parsing amount.It should be zero.If it is not, this indicates that our SGA is probably too small,increase the size of SGA and test again.
Hard parsing is caused by use of literals in SQL (as opposed to bind variables).If the queries in question are our own,we should change them to use bind variables.

We can find this information on the first page.


Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
...
Parses: 33.9 7.2
Hard parses: 0.5 0.1
...

We can see in this system the hard parses is almost zero, which is good.

Now coming to the SGA we can focus on the below considerations:

3)Buffer hit and Library hit percentages:

Check the buffer hit and library hit percentages. We want them to be 100%, if not we should increase the size of SGA.This is also on the first page:

Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 99.82 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 99.52 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 98.63 Soft Parse %: 98.60
Execute to Parse %: 50.96 Latch Hit %: 98.16
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 66.67 % Non-Parse CPU: 97.75

In this case they are also good.

4)Top 5 Timed Foreground Events:

Check the average wait times.Anything over 5ms indicates a problem.If we see database CPU events in the Top 5, this indicates that SGA is too small.We may also be missing indexes.Check the optimizer statistics.

Here are the Top 5 from my environment:

Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
------------------------------ ------------ ----------- ------ ------ ----------
DB CPU 15 59.9
log file sync 1,592 8 5 32.3 Commit
sort segment request 1 1 1001 4.0 Configurat
db file sequential read 216 1 4 3.6 User I/O
db file scattered read 64 0 6 1.5 User I/O

we can see here that the major issue is DB CPU, which generally indicates SGA is too small. However, in this case it is high because this report was run on a VM with the database and BPM sharing the CPU and disk.

Database file sequential/scattered read

These indicate time spent doing table scans and index scans (respectively).If these are high (over 5ms),We should consider moving your data files to reduce disk I/O contention, or move them to faster disks.

5)Enqueue high watermark:

This indicates hardware contention that occurs when there are multiple users inserting into LOB segments at once while the database is trying to reclaim unused space.
We should consider enabling secure files to improve LOB performance (SECURE_FILES=ALWAYS).

We cannot see these in my example report, because this was not a problem in my environment, so it did not make it into the Top 5.If it did, you would see an event called:enq: HW - contention

Other things to be aware of…

We will also check our database configuration.

6)MEMORY_TARGET:

Do not use this setting.We should have our DBA tune the memory manually instead.This will result in a better tuned database.We should start with 60% of physical memory allocated to SGA and 20% to PGA.


7)AUDIT_TRAIL:

Usually we do not use this setting much for tuning.But auditing on Database level
can be overhead to the Database.




Happy Tuning Oracle Databases ...


Best regards,

Rafi.

1 comment:

  1. Rafi, excellent post, and love the inspiring quote at top. There's a nice one here too:


    tuning databases improve performance

    ReplyDelete